DEF LEPPARD

PYROMANIA

Vertigo 6350 119

1983

No Discogs listing  - r2789583 is closest, but published in London not Hamburg and label different as outlined below.
Vertigo 'Swirl' label.
Obviously this is 10 years too late. I have checked the images on Discogs for every 'Vertigo' release worldwide of this album(about 40) and cannot find another one with a similar label, as you would guess they are mostly 'Spaceships'. Nor can I find any mention of this release on the net.
I cannot explain this. Maybe this is a band, or a company using a marketing 'stunt', positioning their release within the cannon of great rock music and in that, this represents early recognition of the iconic motif. However there is nothing else about the album to suggest it was a limited edition or promotional copy. If someone knows, I am happy to be informed / corrected. I am guessing this must be of interest to a 'Swirl' collector. 

Vinyl VG+ - Fully play tested. Some light hairline marks on the surface that do not sound. Spin cleaned with a Knosti (20%IPA) Plays really well with the merest hint of occasional background noise, 

Cover VG+ - Clean, glossy and unmarked. Very good edges, spine and corners. 

Cover itself could be graded as 'mint', however:
The inner sleeve is an anti-static bag, not the red card inner sleeve with catalogue number that is typical on many other releases. The bag is in very good condition and seems genuine but without a Discogs listing, who knows. There was a small paper label on the centre label, I have a whole batch of albums that had these labels, from a collector who had his own unique way of organising things. Normally I leave them on but in this instance I chose to remove it, there remains a slight shadow from the glue (photo 3, below spindle hole).
Matrix side A: 6350  119  1Y  2  ℗  1983  670

Matrix side B: 6350  119  2Y3  670  1  1

£3 Discount for each additional album/12” purchased at the same time.

Listed items that include multiple albums/singles will only attract a single discount

£1.50 Discount for a 2nd single purchased at the same time.

As long as both are non gatefold 3rd, 4th, 5th singles, or combining singles and albums gets complicated because of restrictive size guidelines and the quality of my mail stiffeners. I always endeavour to pass on postage savings to the buyer. If in doubt ask and I’ll see what I can do.

 

Given that Ebay is an unseen, trust based marketplace, my assessment's will be conservative, detailed and based upon listening to the records for sale. My gradings are based upon the Goldmine Standard (abridged and paraphrased from Discogs below).

 

Near Mint (NM or M-)

A nearly perfect record. A NM- record has more than likely never been played, and the vinyl will play perfectly, with no imperfections during playback. I am unlikely to ever use this grading for vinyl quality unless I KNOW a record to be new, unplayed and probably still wrapped.

A 45 RPM or EP sleeve should have no more than the most minor defects, such as any sign of slight handling. An LP cover should have no creases, folds, seam splits, cut-out holes, or other noticeable similar defects. The same should be true of any other inserts, such as posters, lyric sleeves, etc.  

Very Good Plus (VG+)

A Very Good Plus record will show some signs that it was played and otherwise handled by a previous owner who took good care of it. Defects should be more of a cosmetic nature, surfaces may show slight scuffs or very light scratches that don't affect one's listening experiences.

The label may have some ring wear or discoloration, but it should be barely noticeable. Picture sleeves will have some slight wear, lightly turned up corners, or a slight seam split. An LP cover may have slight signs of wear, and may be marred by an indentation or sample distribution cut. In general, if not for a couple of minor things wrong with it, this would be Near Mint. 

Very Good (VG)

Many of the defects found in a VG+ record will be more pronounced in a VG disc. Surface noise will be evident upon playing, but will not overpower the music otherwise. Groove wear will start to be noticeable, as with light scratches that will affect the sound.

Labels may be marred by writing, or have tape or stickers (or their residue) attached. The same will be true of picture sleeves or LP covers. However, it will not have all of these problems at the same time.

Good (G), Good Plus (G+)

In truth I wouldn’t usually bother listing vinyl in this condition, that is with ‘noticeable surface noise and ticks’ although I would consider listing an unusual record with a cover in this condition where ‘seam splits, especially at the bottom or on the spine. Tape, writing, ring wear, or other defects will be present’